I know this is going to come as a shock to you all, but this
isn’t a political blog. It’s a sex blog, obviously. Duh.
So I don’t want any of what I’m about to say to be construed
as me being anything close to resembling political. But I’m guessing that at
least some of you watched the
Presidential Debate last night and so I just have to say this:
They totally would’ve failed my debate class in high school.
Trend-setting in the 90s. It was a tough job, so obviously someone else did it. |
When I was a junior, I took Speech. I don’t know if
that’s what it was actually called, but basically it was a class where you learn
the art of public speaking in the form of being completely f’ing terrified to get
up in front of your fellow classmates every 2-3 weeks to talk for 6 minutes. Also,
let’s all keep in mind that I already had the art of dressing to impress down
to a science, and so I just wanted to round out my whole image by really
knocking it out of the park with my ability to convince people to side with me
on all issues. So of course I chose the really controversial topic of
turn signals.
I know, right? I was always a trailblazer.
Look, there are very few things I remember about most
classes I took in school, likely because I was busy socializing excessively in class. But there are definitely a
few teachers and courses that really stuck out to me, and Speech was one of
them. Why? Because I actually learned something useful that I could take into
real life with me. Granted, when I speak publicly now for work I still want to vomit
and get anxiety acne all across my chin. But the point is that everyone just
thinks that’s how I always look and is super-impressed with my speaking and
convincing abilities. Or so I tell myself as I apply the Proactive.
Regardless, I don’t know what speech-taking courses these politicians are taking, but they clearly
didn’t go to Farmington High School because there was all kinds of learning
going on up in that place.
They should take note:
- No put downs: this is a given, but it was no problem since everyone totally agreed with my notion that people should use their turn signals when they changed lanes because otherwise, that’s just rude.
- Team loses one point for each interruption: ok, so I didn’t have a team against my argument for using turn signals, but in some of the other debates, we did. And we absolutely got docked if we interrupted and it wasn’t our turn. I mean, those are just good Midwestern manners.
- In the first minute, you must lay out your argument clearly and concisely. People should use their turn signals when they’re changing lanes. BOOM. You’ve just been served.
- In the following three minutes, you must give specific examples with facts to back them up. My dad curses under his breath and sometimes puts his hands up in the air when someone cuts him off and they didn’t use their turn signal to let him know ahead of time that he was about to be all slowed down in the fast lane. Fact.
- Don’t be vague. Use clear and concise factual points to get your argument across. There are no two ways about it: people who don’t use their turn signals are suck-y drivers. 100% of non-suck-y drivers agree with this point.
Basically what I’m saying is this: vote for me and we’ll all
be better drivers. I'm so sorry to have gotten so political but there are hot-button issues that just can't be ignored, people!
I gotta admit that what passes for "Debate" is nothing but a cobbling of rules that both parties have argued for so that they have the easiest time making themselves look good rather than actually DEBATING the issues.
ReplyDeleteI almost wish we'd nominated Gingrich ~just~ for the fact that he'd demand classic debating again.
And a moon base. We ~so~ need a moon base.